Return to jazz Philosophy Return to Home
Here is all of the text from the Metheny review....................
Question: Pat, could you tell us your opinion about Kenny G - it appears
you were quoted as being less than enthusiastic about him and his music. I would
say that most of the serious music listeners in the world would not find your
opinion surprising or unlikely - but you were vocal about it for the first time.
You are generally supportive of other musicians it seems.
Pat's Answer: Kenny G is not a musician I really had much of an opinion
about at all until recently. There was not much about the way he played that
interested me one way or the other either live or on records. I first heard him
a number of years ago playing as a sideman with Jeff Lorber when they opened a
concert for my band.
My impression was that he was someone who had spent a fair amount of time
listening to the more pop oriented sax players of that time, like Grover
Washington or David Sanborn, but was not really an advanced player, even in that
style. He had major rhythmic problems and his harmonic and melodic vocabulary
was extremely limited, mostly to pentatonic based and blues-lick derived
patterns, and he basically exhibited only a rudimentary understanding of how to
function as a professional soloist in an
ensemble - Lorber was basically playing him off the bandstand in terms of actual
music. But he did show a knack for connecting to the basest impulses of the
large crowd by deploying his two or three most effective licks (holding long
notes and playing fast runs - never mind that there were lots of harmonic clams
in them) at the keys moments to elicit a powerful crowd reaction (over and over
again). The other main thing I noticed was that he also, as he does to this day,
plays horribly out of tune - consistently sharp.
Of course, I am aware of what he has played since, the success it has had, and
the controversy that has surrounded him among musicians and serious listeners.
This controversy seems to be largely fueled by the fact that he sells an
enormous amount of records while not being anywhere near a really great player
in relation to the standards that have been set on his instrument over the past
sixty or seventy years.
And honestly, there is no small amount of envy involved from musicians who see
one of their fellow players doing so well financially, especially when so many
of them who are far superior as improvisers and musicians in general have
trouble just making a living. There must be hundreds, if not thousands of sax
players around the world who are simply better improvising musicians than Kenny
G on his chosen instruments. It would really surprise me if even he disagreed
with that statement.
Having said that, it has gotten me to thinking lately why so many jazz musicians
(myself included, given the right "bait" of a question, as I will
explain later) and audiences have gone so far as to say that what he is playing
is not even jazz at all.
Stepping back for a minute, if we examine the way he plays, especially if one
can remove the actual improvising from the often mundane background environment
that it is delivered in, we see that his saxophone style is in fact clearly in
the tradition of the kind of playing that most reasonably objective listeners
WOULD normally quantify as being jazz. It's just that as jazz or even as
music in a general sense, with these standards in mind, it is simply not up to
the level of playing that we historically associate with professional
improvising musicians. So, lately I have been advocating that we go ahead and
just include it under the word jazz - since pretty much of the rest of the world
OUTSIDE of the jazz
community does anyway - and let the chips fall where they may.
And after all, why he should be judged by any other standard, why he should be
exempt from that that all other serious musicians on his instrument are judged
by if they attempt to use their abilities in an improvisational context playing
with a rhythm section as he does? He SHOULD be compared to John Coltrane or
Wayne Shorter, for instance, on his abilities (or lack thereof) to play the
soprano saxophone and his success (or lack thereof) at finding a way to deploy
that instrument in an ensemble in order to
accurately gauge his abilities and put them in the context of his instrument 's
legacy and potential.
As a composer of even eighth note based music, he SHOULD be compared to Herbie
Hancock, Horace Silver or even Grover Washington. Suffice it to say, on all
above counts, at this point in his development, he wouldn't fare well.
But, like I said at the top, this relatively benign view was all "until
recently".
Not long ago, Kenny G put out a recording where he overdubbed himself on top of
a 30+ year old Louis Armstrong record, the track "What A Wonderful
World" With this single move, Kenny G became one of the few people on
earth I can say that I really can't use at all - as a man, for his incredible
arrogance to even consider such a thing, and as a musician, for presuming to
share the stage with the single most important figure in our music.
This type of musical necrophilia - the technique of overdubbing on the
pre-existing tracks of already dead performers - was weird when Natalie Cole did
it with her dad on "Unforgettable" a few years ago, but it was her
dad. When Tony Bennett did it with Billie Holiday it was bizarre, but we are
talking about two of the greatest singers of the 20th century who were on
roughly the same level of artistic accomplishment. When Larry Coryell presumed
to overdub himself on top of a Wes Montgomery track, I lost a lot of the respect
that I ever had for him - and I have to seriously question the fact that I did
have respect for someone who could turn out to have had such unbelievably bad
taste and be that disrespectful to one of my personal heroes.
But when Kenny G decided that it was appropriate for him to defile the music of
the man who is probably the greatest jazz musician that has ever lived by
spewing his lame-ass, jive, pseudo bluesy, out-of-tune, noodling, wimped out,
fucked up playing all over one of the great Louis' tracks (even one of his
lesser ones), he did something that I would not have imagined possible. He, in
one move, through his unbelievably pretentious and calloused musical decision to
embark on this most cynical of musical paths, shit all over the graves of all
the musicians past and present who have risked their lives by going out there on
the road for years and years developing their own music inspired by the
standards of grace that Louis Armstrong brought to every single note he played
over an amazing lifetime as a musician. By disrespecting Louis, his legacy and
by default, everyone who has ever tried to do something positive with improvised
music and what it can be, Kenny G has created a new low point in modern culture
- something that we all should be totally embarrassed about - and afraid of. We
ignore this, "let it slide" , at our own peril. His callous disregard
for the larger issues of what this crass gesture implies is exacerbated by the
fact that the only reason he could possibly have for doing something this
inherently wrong (on both human and musical terms) was for the record sales and
the money it would bring.
Since that record came out - in protest, as insignificant as it may be, I
encourage everyone to boycott Kenny G recordings, concerts and anything he is
associated with. If asked about Kenny G, I will diss him and his music with the
same passion that is in evidence in this little essay.
Normally, I feel that musicians all have a hard enough time, regardless of their
level, just trying to play good and don't really benefit from public criticism,
particularly from their fellow players. But, this is different.
There ARE some things that are sacred - and amongst any musician that has ever
attempted to address jazz at even the most basic of levels, Louis Armstrong and
his music is hallowed ground. To ignore this trespass is to agree that NOTHING
any musician has attempted to do with their life in music has any intrinsic
value - and I refuse to do that. (I am also amazed that there HASN'T already
been an outcry against this among music critics - where ARE they on
this?????!?!?!?!-, Magazines, etc.). Everything I said here is exactly the
same as what I would say to Gorelick if I ever saw him in person. And if I ever
DO see him anywhere, at any function - he WILL get a piece of my mind, and maybe
a guitar wrapped around his head. NOTE: This post is partially in response
to the comments that people have made regarding a short video interview excerpt
with me that was posted on the internet taken
from a TV show for young people (kind of like MTV) in Poland where I was asked
to address 8 to 11 year old kids on terms that they could understand about jazz.
While enthusiastically describing the virtues of this great area of music, I was
encouraging the kids to find and listen to some of the greats in the music and
not to get confused by the sometimes-
overwhelming volume of music that falls under the jazz umbrella. I went on to
say that I think that for instance, "Kenny G plays the dumbest music on the
planet" - something that all 8 to 11 year kids on the planet already
intrinsically know, as anyone who has ever spent any time around kids that age
could confirm - so it gave us some common ground for the rest of the discussion.
(ADDENDUM: The only thing wrong with the statement that I made was that I did
not include the rest of the known universe.)
The fact that this clip was released so far out of the context that it was
delivered in is a drag, but it is now done. (Its unauthorized release out of
context like that is symptomatic of the new electronically interconnected
culture that we now live in - where pretty much anything anyone anywhere has
ever said or done has the potential to become common public property at any
time.) I was surprised by the Polish people putting this clip up so far away
from the use that it was intended -really just for the attention - with no
explanation of the show it was made for - they (the Polish people in general)
used to be so hip and would have been unlikely candidates to do something like
that before, but I guess everything is changing there like it is everywhere
else.
The only other thing that surprised me in the aftermath of the release of this
little interview is that ANYONE would be even a little bit surprised that I
would say such a thing, given the reality of Mr. G's music. This makes me
want to go practice about 10 times harder, because that suggests to me that I am
not getting my own musical message across clearly enough - which to me, in every
single way and intention is diametrically opposed to what Kenny G seems to be
after.
by Pat Metheny